Phytogenics represents a 'promising' category of naturally-derived growth promoters originating from herbs and spices
Many phytogenic agents are well known from human nutrition, where they have a long tradition in the flavouring of foods.
It is, however, not only their flavouring properties, but also a number of biological activities, which make phytogenics an encouraging approach in animal nutrition.
Trials conducted at different universities and research institutes in Europe and in the United States have shown considerable positive effects of phytogenics on growth performance.
Significant improvements in feed conversion have been obtained, also in comparison to antibiotic growth promoters.
As a consequence of ongoing research, phytogenics are regarded as effective performance enhancers, especially in antibiotic-free feeding systems.
The swine production sector is facing several challenges.
The removal of antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs), for example, has put additional pressure on European swine producers.
Consequently, the implementation of sound hygienic farm conditions and elaborate feeding concepts are corner stones of sustainability and profitability in modern swine production.
The need for optimal feed efficiency, in terms of feed conversion ratios, becomes even more evident in present times of rising prices for feed ingredients.
Growing concern about AGPs in animal nutrition has created efforts to use different alternative growth-promoting agents in swine nutrition.
Among potential candidates, phytogenics represent a new and exciting group of feed additives, originating principally from herbs, spices or other plants.
An improvement in feed conversion ratio has been observed in recent trials conducted at different universities and research institutes in Europe and in the United States.
Phytogenics affect feed conversion.
Optimising feed conversion ratio is crucial for efficiency in swine production.
A trial was recently carried out at Kansas State University, United States, to evaluate the efficacy of phytogenics in comparison to AGPs in post-weaning piglets (Sulabo et al, 2007).
192 piglets (22 days of age) were assigned to four treatment groups: Group 1 was fed a negative control diet without growth-promoters.
Groups 2 and 3 received the negative control diet supplemented with phytogenics.
Group 4 was offered a positive control diet containing AGPs (140g/t neomycin sulfate and 140g/t oxytetracycline HCl).
Growth performance was significantly improved over the negative control group when phytogenics or AGPs were added to the feed.
In terms of average daily gains, the pigs fed phytogenics were intermediate between the negative control and the AGPs.
Feed conversion, however, was best in the groups receiving phytogenics.
The phytogenic feed additive under investigation contained a defined blend of essential oils from anise, citrus and oregano, as well as plant extracts.
It can be concluded from the outcome of this trial that well-selected phytogenics can be successfully used to improve growth performance in post-weaning piglets, especially in antibiotic-free feeding regimens.
The results from Kansas State University confirmed positive observations obtained in previous experiments.
A trial conducted in Denmark by Danske Slagterier also showed an increase in performance when the feed was supplemented with phytogenics.
In this trial, 384 pigs (five weeks of age) were fed either a negative control diet or the negative control diet with supplemental phytogenics.
The feed was pelleted at a minimum temperature of 81C.
Not only daily gain and feed conversion ratio were improved by 5.2 and 4.5%, respectively.
Also the Danish Production Value was increased by 10.3% through supplementation of the feed with phytogenics.
The Danish Production Value represents an indicator of productivity and is calculated as follows: (kg gain x DKK/kg gain) - (no of analysed FUp x DKK/FUp), with figures being based on average local prices.
Similarly, recent observations from a field trial conducted in South Africa (Carletonville area, North West Province) have shown substantial benefits of phytogenics in weaned pigs.
The trial was carried out on a commercial farm and lasted 37 days.
Pigs in group A (control) were fed a basal diet containing Tylan (1kg/t) and zinc oxide (4kg/t), whereas pigs in group B were fed the basal diet supplemented with phytogenics (Biomin P.E.P.).
Considerable improvements in daily weight gain were seen when the pigs were fed phytogenics.
Moreover, pigs in group B were more uniform in size at the end of the trial.
As supported by the above trial data, phytogenics work well in diets with or without antibiotics and could even replace AGPs in feed formulations for swine.
Meanwhile, the use of AGPs is also a subject of public criticism in North America and discussions about a potential ban of these substances - following the example of Europe - are anticipated to become more and more substantial.
The experience from Europe shows that the ban of AGPs does definitely not leave an insuperable hurdle for swine producers.
One reason is that management practices can still be optimised in order to improve hygienic conditions and to minimize the impact of environmental stressors.
Furthermore, effective alternative feed additives are available, such as demonstrated in the above trial results.
Phytogenic feed additives are usually available in the form of dried and ground material, extracts or essential oils.
They contain a large number of biological activities, therefore having the potential to beneficially affect gut health and performance.
However, phytogenic feed additives usually vary seriously in their chemical composition.
Hence, there are large differences in efficacy between phytogenic products in the market.
A big challenge for swine producers is to find the suitable product formulation out of an increasing number of phytogenic feed additives which are available.
Only formulations which are based on profound scientific research can be expected to deliver sustainably an improvement in growth performance.
Although scientific literature about phytogenic agents is multiplying rapidly, there is still a remarkable lack of information regarding the mode of action of phytogenics and the answer to the question: How do phytogenics work in the animal? How do phytogenics work?.
Many herbs and spices are known for their flavoring properties, thus having the potential to stimulate voluntary feed intake - an effect often observed in lactating sows (Miller et al, 2003).
In the production of piglets, weaning is an extremely critical point, since the transition from sow's milk to solid feed is a challenge to the young piglets' digestive system, which can easily cause diarrhoea coinciding with dramatic drops in performance.
Well-selected phytogenics may stabilize gut health and support digestion during this critical period.
An extensive study, carried out at the University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna (Kroismayr et al, 2005), was directed to discover the mode of action of phytogenics, using the above-mentioned phytogenic additive as model substance in growing pigs.
The researchers discovered significant effects caused by the phytogenic additive, with respect to gastrointestinal, as well as blood and immune parameters.
Moreover, these effects were associated with improved growth performance.
Conclusion and outlook.
Well-investigated phytogenics are an efficient tool to support animal health and growth performance.
Since they do not pose any risk regarding antibiotic resistance or residues in animal products such as meat, eggs or milk, phytogenics are expected to gain high consumer's acceptance and are generally regarded as safe alternatives to AGPs.
Particular attention, however, has to be paid on the composition of formulations which are available in the market.
Only a well-balanced and scientifically developed combination of active ingredients with different properties can be expected to function synergistically in order to bring about the desired benefits for the producer.
